Windows open source

Welcome to my “Windows open source.”

Recently, a report that Microsoft's Windows may move toward open source in the future has aroused strong repercussions in the industry. Most of the commentators think Microsoft's Windows open source is due to Microsoft's poor performance in the current mobile device market (such as smartphones) and traditional PCs Industry-based self-help micro-a wise choice. Is this really true?https://www.blogger.com

First of all, we want to say is whether Microsoft is necessary to open source, that the current modest PC market and poor performance in the smartphone market is due to the closed source of Windows itself. In fact, the industry knows that there are many reasons for the PC-based market fragility. Among them, the weak user demand and the impact of the tablet PC and the smartphone are more important factors. However, from the perspective of the entire PC eco-environment, Microsoft's Windows still occupies an irreplaceable position Advantages, despite competition from Apple's Mac X and Google's Chrome OS, with little or no effect, even more crucial is that even Microsoft, a longtime rival in the PC industry, has failed to shake Microsoft Windows in the PC industry Absolutely leading position, although Microsoft also made in the process of the industry considered a fatal mistake (such as the failure of Vista). These are enough to prove that Microsoft Windows in the PC industry's competitiveness and perfection, so Windows open source at least in the PC industry to enhance Microsoft's competitiveness is negligible, Moreover, Microsoft has also defeated Linux in this industry. Have defeated open source, but now they have to open source, which in itself is full of contradictions is not it?

Look at the industry criticized Microsoft's smartphone (including tablet PC) market. We think Microsoft's tepid performance in this market, for many reasons, such as the strategic emphasis on the mobile market before. Do you remember the sarcastic remarks made by Microsoft CEO Ballmer on the Apple iPhone? The second is the so-called system convergence strategy Microsoft took after realizing the importance of the mobile market. Although the idea of integration is good, before the launch of Windows10, Microsoft's so-called convergence strategy is actually not a true fusion, that is, did not use a unified Windows kernel. The key is that the traditional PC and the mobile market represented by smartphones and tablets are completely different application scenarios and methods, which determines the technical difficulty of a system (including the ecosystem) to take into account the cross-border experience and the actual user needs , Which is one of the main reasons why Apple and Google still use different systems in the mobile and PC markets today.

The other is Microsoft's development strategy in the mobile market itself. For example, choose to cooperate with Nokia until later mergers and acquisitions, including the emergence of Nokia anti-water repeatedly (such as the launch of its own Meego system N9 mobile phone and Android-based mobile phones, etc.), while delays, while the industry for Microsoft in the mobile market, Windows More importantly, after the acquisition of Nokia, Microsoft's flagship low-cost strategy (ASP for mobile phones was only $ 45) made the already fragile Microsoft mobile ecosystem more vulnerable. According to related research and analysis, users who purchase high-priced mobile phones are more willing to pay for the application and vice versa. Microsoft's low-cost mobile phone strategy, allowing users to purchase applications is difficult, at least with Apple's iOS and Google's Android compared. However, the knock-on effect is that developers have a hard time getting revenue from Microsoft's mobile ecosystem. This, in turn, has affected their enthusiasm for Microsoft's application development and created a vicious cycle.

For example, recently, as one of WP's hot weather applications, Weather Flow has been officially removed from the store. In response, Gergely Orosz, the developer of the app, said that the main reason for being out of the shelves is that Weather Flow's data usage fee is as high as $ 1,500 a month, while the developer Gergely Orosz received only 500 US dollar, and is still falling. According to statistics, many current mainstream applications on the iOS and Android platforms have not yet entered the Windows platform, even if it is stationed, its experience and iOS and Android platforms compared to similar applications there are gaps.

From the above analysis is not difficult to see that Microsoft's downturn in the PC market and the tepid mobile market is not directly related to whether Windows is closed source or open source. Then the next question is, what if Windows really open source?

For example, in the PC market, the existing Windows ecosystem will be broken and many applications will be reinvigorated. This is undoubtedly the biggest blow to the enterprise users who have always relied on Microsoft. The second is that individual users will also suffer from the open source of Microsoft's Windows Have to face changes in habits. Remember before the Windows8 poor performance in the market the main reason? Is not used by the user, but do not forget this is still under the premise of the overall development of Windows strategy and framework introduced under the premise of what can be imagined once open source. In the mobile market, the industry can be simply compared to Google's Android, fragmentation will be inevitable. The key is the result of fragmentation is that Google failed to install their core applications via Android on the user's mobile phone, which makes Google had the purpose of Android was greatly reduced, which is why Google released the Android One the main reason that through The system reclaims control over Android. However, at present, the effect is not obvious. But those tactics that will make Microsoft profitable through apps and services just look beautiful.

To sum up, we think that Microsoft's Windows open source both in the PC, or in the mobile market are more harm than good for Microsoft, and we need to be noted that the so-called Microsoft Windows open source was originally a Microsoft source of a technical staff , And in its discussion of the open source part only said that some of the open source code, not to mention here, the staff just to talk about it, even if in the future Microsoft really like what it said open source, but it is clear that some open source is at best a " Pseudo-open source "only.

Microsoft open source, the world's fortunate, human beings fortunate, in fact, the operating system, programming platform, Microsoft is still unparalleled, the reason is not optimistic, from over-closed, at least before the open, now actually learn from open to open-source It's ridiculous to be completely autistic, neither open nor open-sourced. Now open source, it will immediately get rid of all competitors in the operating system field, and the government, defense, weapons, banks, the military will dare to go to WINDOWS, after all, Windows is the world's most powerful operating system. If you continue to learn Apple, will draw a tiger is not the opposite category of dogs, different corporate models, different concepts, the way is different. Apple because entertainment companies, arts companies in the category of technology companies, can be closed, after all, for Apple, the technology is second, the customer likes and profit maximization is the most important. Microsoft is different, it has always been the world leader in science and technology, is destined to science and technology is the first one, closed their own, can only be a dead end, big open source, will be universal. As for the profit, after the popularity of large, profit is already a show of hands, free QQ is an example. QQ is just an instant messaging platform that has brought billowing money after its popularity. Windows is a large platform for computers, mobile terminals and service terminals. If the world is hugely popular, is not that profitable?